Big O notation is a way of describing how fast/slow an algorithm is.

O(n) (pronounced "big oh of en") means that the time it takes the algorithm to run increases linearly with the amount of data being processed.

O(n^2) means that the time it takes the algorithm to run increases dramatically when the amount of data increases slightly.

Big O sets an upper limit for how long an algorithm will run. If an algorithm is O(n) then it is also, by definition, O(n log n), O(n^2), O(2^n), and O(n!). It would still be most accurate to say the algorithm is O(n).

Fastest

- O(1) = constant speed regardless of the data

- O(log log n)

- O(log n)

- O(sqrt(n))

- O(n)

- O(n log n)

- O(n^2)

- O(2^n)

- O(n!)

Slowest

Diagram of speeds

[source: Big O Cheat Sheet]

Big O specifies an upper-bound.

(pronounced Big Oh)

Big Ω specifies a lower-bound.

(pronounced Big Omega)

Big Ө specifies that the upper-bound and lower-bound are the same. This is called the tight-bound.

(pronounced Big Theta)

These bounds are all asymptotic. That means that they ignore any constant in the time complexity of your algorithm (usually called "k"). For example, if you have to open a database connection, that operation will take a constant amount of time that is not related to the amount of data you are processing. It may be that for small data sets, this constant k is high enough that your algorithm is slower than O(n). But the algorithm still is O(n) because when you test very large sets of data, the constant k is relatively insignificant.

So an asymptotic bound is a bound for data sets that are large enough to ignore constant time complexities.

[source: Big O Cheat Sheet]

Operation and space complexity of standard data structures:

```
Data Structure | Time Complexity | Space Complexity | Data Structures
| Average | Worst Case | Worst Case |
| Access | Search | Insert | Delete | Access | Search | Insert | Delete | |
Array | Ө(1) | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | O(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | Array
Stack | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | Stack
Queue | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | Queue
Linked List | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | Linked List
Double Linked List | Ө(n) | Ө(n) | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | O(n) | O(n) | O(1) | O(1) | O(n) | Double Linked List
Skip List | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n log n) | Skip List
Hash Table | N/A | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | Ө(1) | N/A | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | Hash Table
Binary Search Tree | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | Binary Search Tree
Cartesian Tree | N/A | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | N/A | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | Cartesian Tree
B-Tree | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(n) | B-Tree
Red-Black Tree | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(n) | Red-Black Tree
Splay Tree | N/A | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | N/A | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(n) | Splay Tree
AVL Tree | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(log n) | O(n) | AVL Tree
KD Tree | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | Ө(log n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | O(n) | KD Tree
```

Array sorting algorithms:

```
Algorithm | Time Complexity | Space Complexity |
| Best | Average | Worst | Worst |
Quick Sort | Ω(n log n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n^2) | O(log n)
Merge Sort | Ω(n log n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n)
Tim Sort | Ω(n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n)
Heap Sort | Ω(n log n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(1)
Bubble Sort | Ω(n) | Ө(n^2) | O(n^2) | O(1)
Insertion Sort | Ω(n) | Ө(n^2) | O(n^2) | O(1)
Selection Sort | Ω(n^2) | Ө(n^2) | O(n^2) | O(1)
Tree Sort | Ω(n log n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n^2) | O(n)
Shell Sort | Ω(n log n) | Ө(n(log n)^2) | O(n(log n)^2) | O(1)
Bucket Sort | Ω(n + k) | Ө(n + k) | O(n^2) | O(n)
Radix Sort | Ω(n k) | Ө(n k) | O(n k) | O(n + k)
Counting Sort | Ω(n + k) | Ө(n + k) | O(n + k) | O(n)
Cube Sort | Ω(n) | Ө(n log n) | O(n log n) | O(n)
```

Lists vs Arrays:

- Lists are stored in heap memory, Arrays are stored in stack memory.

- List length is dynamic, Array length is static.

- You can insert nodes and remove nodes from a List quickly. With Arrays, you have to recreate the Array each time.

- Binary search works on Arrays because you can easily access any index of the Array. Binary search doesn't work on Lists because the indexes have to be accessed sequentially.

- Lists take more memory to store the same data as an Array because each node in the List requires a pointer to the next node.

- Arrays can be cached more easily because all the memory locations are right next to each other.

A linked list is an ordered collection of nodes. Unlike an array, each node of a linked list may be stored at any location in memory. Each node includes a pointer to the location of the next node in memory.

```
(head) (tail)
variable → █ → █ → █ → █ → null
```

```
class ListNode
{
Object Data;
ListNode NextNode = null;
}
```

The tail node points back to the head node, forming a full circle.

```
(head) (tail)
variable → █ → █ → █ → █
↑ │
└───────────┘
```

Each node includes a pointer both forward to the next node and one backwards to the previous node.

If the tail node also connects to the head node, it makes a Circular Doubly Linked List.

```
(head) (tail)
variable → █ ↔ █ ↔ █ ↔ █ → null
```

```
class ListNode
{
Object Data;
ListNode NextNode = null;
ListNode PreviousNode = null;
}
```

In-Place Sort

Any algorithm that rearranges the elements in the list.

Might use a constant amount of extra memory, at most.

Ex: Insertion Sort and Selection Sort are In-Place.

Ex: Merge Sort and Counting Sort are not In-Place.

Internal vs External Sort

An external sort is used when the full list cannot be held in memory at one time.

Ex: Merge Sort can be used for External Sorting.

Stable Sort

A sort is stable if inputs A and B with the same Key appear in the same order in the output as they appeared in the input.

In other words, stability means that equivalent elements retain their relative positions.

Ex: Bubble Sort, Insertion Sort, Merge Sort, and Counting Sort are stable by nature.

Ex: Quick Sort and Heap Sort can be made stable, but don't start that way.

Selection Sort always takes the same amount of time: Best, Average, and Worst Times are (n^2).

Selection Sort is an in-place sort.

Selection Sort is a comparison sort.

Algorithm:

Keep track of two sections of the array - the sorted part, and the unsorted part.

Until the entire array is sorted:

Find the smallest element in the unsorted part.

Swap the smallest element with the first element of the unsorted part.

Now the sorted part is one element longer than it was.

Time is always (n^2) because no matter what order the array starts in, you must make N pass-throughs of gradually smaller sections of the array.

Best Time: Ω(n)

Average and Worst Time: θ(n^2) O(n^2)

Bubble Sort is an in-place algorithm.

Bubble Sort is a comparison algorithm.

Algorithm:

Loop through the array until it is sorted.

For each adjacent pair of elements, swap them if they are in the wrong order.

Best Time is Ω(n) when the array is already sorted, and one pass-through confirms this.

Worst Time is O(n^2) because if the smallest element starts at the end of the array, it can only be moved toward the front 1 index per pass-through. So you'd need to make N pass-throughs.

Best Time: Ω(n)

Average and Worst Time: θ(n^2) O(n^2)

Insertion Sort is an in-place algorithm.

Insertion Sort is a comparison algorithm.

Algorithm:

Keep track of two sections of the array - the sorted part, and the unsorted part.

Until the entire array is sorted:

Take the first element in the unsorted part.

Bubble sort that element backwards into its correct position in the sorted part.

Now the sorted part is one element longer than it was.

Best Time is Ω(n) when the array is already sorted, and one pass-through confirms this.

Average and Worst Time is (n^2) because this is a modified Bubble Sort.

Best, Average, and Worst Times: (n log(n))

Heap Sort is an in-place sort.

Heap Sort is a comparison algorithm.

Complete Binary Tree:

A binary tree in which all levels are completely full, except possibly the last level where all elements are as far left as possible.

Can be stored as an array, which is an efficient use of space.

Parent at index I means the children are at 2I+1 and 2I+2.

Binary Heap:

A complete binary tree such that each parent is smaller than its children.

(Min Heap means the parent is smaller, Max Heap means the parent is larger.)

Algorithm:

(To sort into ascending order)

Build a Max Heap.

Keep track of two sections of the array - the heap part, and the sorted part.

Until the heap part is empty:

Take the root of the heap (the largest unsorted element).

Swap that root with the last element in the heap.

Re-heapify the heap, which is now 1 element smaller than it was before.

To re-heapify, continually swap the moved element with its largest child that is larger than itself.

Build Max Heap:

Algorithm:

For index I = floor(N/2)-1 to I = 0

Heapify Ith element

Time complexity: O(n log(n))

Because N/2 calls to Heapify - the 1/2 part doesn't count in Big-O so that's N calls to Heapify.

And Heapify takes O(log(n)) time.

So the total is O(n log(n))

Heap Sort is (n log(n)) because:

(N log(N)) to build the heap.

N to iterate over the whole array once to put the elements in order TIMES log(N) for re-heapify each time.

Results in 2(N log(N)) which in Big O is simply O(N log(N)).

Best and Average Time: Ω(n log(n)) θ(n log(n))

Worst Time: O(n^2)

Quick Sort is a divide and conquer algorithm.

Quick Sort is a comparison algorithm.

Quick Sort is an in-place sort.

Algorithm:

Select a pivot element (it can be any element in the array).

Partition: move all smaller elements before the pivot and all larger elements after the pivot.

Recurse:

Run that on each subsection of the array you just created - the section from start to just before the pivot and the section from just after the pivot to end.

Partition:

Partition can be done in linear (N) time.

Start index LOW at the first element that is larger than PIVOT.

Working backwards from the end of the array:

If an element is less than PIVOT, swap it with LOW.

Move LOW forward until it is again on an element larger than PIVOT.

Continue thus until LOW meets your backwards-moving index.

Finally, swap PIVOT into the in-between space.

Worst case time O(n^2) occurs if the selection of pivot repeatedly results in one section being size N-1.

Best case time Ω(n log(n)):

(log(N)) because if the pivot perfectly splits the array in half over and over, we will end up with log(N) number of levels (halves, then quarters, then eighths...).

(N) because the entire array is being processed at each level. I.e. processing 2 halves, or 4 quarters, or 8 eighths.

Result is N * log(N) time.

Best, Average, Worst Time: (n log(n))

Merge Sort is a divide and conquer algorithm.

Merge Sort is a comparison algorithm.

Merge Sort is NOT an in-place sort. It uses a lot of extra memory.

Merge Sort can be an external sort - meaning the entire array is NOT kept in memory at one time.

Algorithm:

Divide the array in half.

Call Merge Sort on each half.

Merge the sorted halves together.

Start at the beginning of each half.

Copy the smaller element to the resulting array and increment that one index forward.

Continue until both halves have been copied to the resulting array.

Time complexity is always (N log(N)):

log(N) because we're splitting the array in half repeatedly, give us log(N) levels.

N because at each level, the entire array is processed.

Result is N * log(N) time.

Best and Average Time: Ω(n+k) θ(n+k) with K referring to the number of buckets.

Worst Time: O(n^2)

Bucket Sort is a good choice when input values are uniformly spread across a range of value.

Bucket Sort works on non-integer values, unlike Counting Sort.

Algorithm:

Create K empty buckets (arrays, lists).

Copy each element (value X) into bucket number K*X.

Sort each bucket with Insertion Sort.

Concatenate the sorted buckets together.

Average Time θ(n+k):

N because it takes one pass-through to copy elements into buckets.

Insertion into the head of a linked list takes O(1) time.

N again (on average) to Insertion Sort all the buckets, assuming values are uniformly distributed.

K because of concatenating all the buckets together. (If they are linked lists, that means K operations.)

Result is 2 * N + K time, or simply (N+K) time complexity.

Worst Time O(n^2):

Because of the worst case time of insertion sort, and if all the elements ended up in one bucket.

Best, Average, and Worst Time: (nk) with K being the number of digits in the elements.

Appropriate when elements are in range 1 to N^2.

Algorithm:

For each digit in the elements, from least significant to most significant:

Sort array with Stable Counting Sort on just that digit.

Time Complexity is (NK):

N because Counting Sort is O(N + 10). (10 because numbers 0 through 9).

K because you run Counting Sort K times, once for each digit-place.

Result is N * K time.

Time complexity: O(N + K)

Space complexity: O(N + K)

Where N is the number of elements in the unsorted array, and K is the number of possible values.

Appropriate if you know the exact range of values that might be in the list, and they are discrete values (like integers, not decimals), and the range isn't too big.

Sample unsorted array, with possible value range 0-9:

```
1, 4, 1, 2, 7, 5, 2
```

Algorithm:

- Create an array whose length covers the range of possible values. This is the counting array.

- Iterate through the unsorted data once, incrementing the corresponding slot in the counting array for each value. You're counting up how many times each value occurs.

```
Counting array: 0, 2, 2, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0
```

- If you're just dealing with integers or characters, you can just iterate through the counting array now, outputting each value in the right quantities.
- If you're dealing with more complex objects, continue.

- Iterate through the counting array, adding to each slot the total counts from previous slots. This is now an array of indexes in the sorted array.

```
Counting array: 0, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7
```

- Iterate through the unsorted array. For each value, place it at the index indicated in the counting array and decrement the slot in the counting array.
```
Unsorted array: 1, 4, 1, 2, 7, 5, 2
Counting array: 0, 2, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 7
Sorted array: 1, 1, 2, 2, 4, 5, 7
```

Sequential Search

Each element is checked in sequence.

Interval Search

Faster searches that require a sorted data set.

Very few elements are actually checked.

Time: O(n)

Algorithm:

Check each element in an array, in order.

Time: O(log n)

An interval search - requires a sorted array.

Algorithm:

Jump to the middle element and check it.

If it is higher than the target, run binary search on the first half of the array.

If it is lower than the target, run binary search on the last half of the array.

Time: O(Sqrt(N)) when M is Sqrt(N)

An interval search - requires a sorted array.

Algorithm:

Select a block size M.

Check array[0], then array[M], then array[2M], etc until you find the block that must contain the target.

Run linear search on that block.

The ideal M is SquareRoot(N), since in the worst case you'll have to check ((N/M) + M - 1) elements.

Time: O(log log n)

Time if data is not uniformly distributed: O(n)

An interval search - requires a sorted array.

Appropriate when the data set is uniformly distributed.

Interpolation Search is a variation of Binary Search, where the index you jump to is weighted based on knowing that the data is uniformly distributed. Ex: if the target is closer to the last value than the first, we start searching near the end of the array.

Index to search = startingIndex + ( ((targetValue - array[startingIndex])*(endingIndex - startingIndex)) / (array[endingIndex] - array[startingIndex]) )

Time: O(log n)

An interval search - requires a sorted array.

Appropriate when size of array is infinite - it does not search farther than it needs to.

Algorithm:

For Length=1 until array[Length-1] > target:

Length*=2

Binary Search in range [Length/2, Length-1].

Time: O(log n)

An interval search - requires a sorted array.

Appropriate when plus/minus operations are cheaper than division operations. (as compared to Binary Search)

Appropriate when the entire data set does not fit into memory at once.

Fibonacci Numbers: 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, 34...

Algorithm:

M = the lowest Fibonacci number that is <= length of array

m = the Fibonacci index of M

i = (m-2)th Fibonacci number

Check array[i], return if target is found.

If target > array[i], recurse over later subarray.

If target < array[i], recurse over earlier subarray.